Feminism and his modern concepts

Based on Marguerite A. Peeters “Marion — ética”

International conference about population density and development from Cairo , it was carry trough in Egypt in 1994 , it started new debatable terms wich were brought by a radical minorities.

179 states with differents ideas about family and sexuality invited a radical minoritie , topics like overpopulation , shortage of natural resources and fertility was living aside in 1994 , they started adebate about sexual segurity , birth control , the access to abortion , free of violence and equal opportunities.

This term was used by guest group , this term incorporates the universal laws whit a new ideas such as save abortion , the most controversial topic ; It is`n not presented like a option , its presented like a universal law such as the education or the healthy.the point of view in the conference is based in the free love , the right to choose ,the contraception. Maybe , this mean a deconstruction of the universal .

boosted for the Simone de beauvoir´s philosophy existentialist and Sartre´s philosophy .This reasons have a intention rebuild the default.

The ethics of consent includes 3 essential points, full, free and informed. The individual must have the information about the choice he will make to examine his options, to this should be added the full and free.

In the conference, the minority group emphasized the Muslims on this point, and with the Catholic Church as the only religion that opposed this proposal, the conference remarked on one condition.

Unsafe abortion occurs in countries where abortion is prohibited, they argued, at this point the idea is distorted with a certain existentialist and at the same time individualist philosophy, they promote the right to choose abortion for women, denying any choice to the man for which this proposal would mean an obligation to health professionals to submit to the new ethics where the choice is not subject to a couple’s decision and this leaves us with the question: Is this equality?

At this point not only the feminist current is present at the conference, preserves the carrot of the LGTB, putting concepts within the modern current of feminism breaking the concept of family opening possibilities to diversity and especially to the point already mentioned the family planning but not only includes the concept to homosexual couples but to reconstituted families after several divorces and maintains in the proposal that an unmarried couple can be called family tra the commitment of the welfare of each other, in effect this is arrived at a deconstruction of father mother roles. And why? The feminists conclude in an inequality in the role, arguing that women perform more work than men and that this is considered by society as inferior work.

The rise of individualism in feminist thought is increased at this point having a relationship with safe abortion, the altercation of the question: Who is the most important woman and her choice to abortion or the fetus within it? is answered at this point, after the conference in Bucharest, new meanings were given to terms established as the term family, from this conference is not given the signifier of parents, but, that of individuals and couples. Already restructured this concept It is clear to say that individuals are located above the child and that health as a woman as an individual and not as a mother is placed on top of the unborn child.

These new terms can become ambiguous and knowing these definitions will make us thinkers and not followers, it is very easy to read them and imagine the best of those words for women, however, they have very broad concepts that not only include interests collective, but, interests of minorities over majorities because feminism is not each and every one of the women, feminism is a retail group that demands the majority, and in many occasions, they are with these terms confused for the crowd that makes a protest of the blind painting cities and walking the streets.

Related posts:

It turns out I have a lot of shoulds in my life. Shoulds are one of those taboo words we aren’t supposed to use. Or shall I say we shouldn’t use. Ironic, huh? We shouldn’t use should. But even saying…

I recently moved to a new city and I was being introduced to someone at a dinner party. Our mutual friend let us know that we both went to the same college and immediately the conversation started…

The core purpose of this article is to explain the working of Vanilla JS, for creating a music player. Below is the styling of the music player; the album cover rotates and the title of the music…